Return to search results
💡 Advanced Search Tip
Search by organization or tag to find related datasets
Use of Computerized Crime Mapping by Law Enforcement in the United States, 1997-1998
As a first step in understanding law enforcement agencies'
use and knowledge of crime mapping, the Crime Mapping Research Center
(CMRC) of the National Institute of Justice conducted a nationwide
survey to determine which agencies were using geographic information
systems (GIS), how they were using them, and, among agencies that were
not using GIS, the reasons for that choice. Data were gathered using a
survey instrument developed by National Institute of Justice staff,
reviewed by practitioners and researchers with crime mapping
knowledge, and approved by the Office of Management and Budget. The
survey was mailed in March 1997 to a sample of law enforcement
agencies in the United States. Surveys were accepted until May 1,
1998. Questions asked of all respondents included type of agency,
population of community, number of personnel, types of crimes for
which the agency kept incident-based records, types of crime analyses
conducted, and whether the agency performed computerized crime
mapping. Those agencies that reported using computerized crime mapping
were asked which staff conducted the mapping, types of training their
staff received in mapping, types of software and computers used,
whether the agency used a global positioning system, types of data
geocoded and mapped, types of spatial analyses performed and how
often, use of hot spot analyses, how mapping results were used, how
maps were maintained, whether the department kept an archive of
geocoded data, what external data sources were used, whether the
agency collaborated with other departments, what types of Department
of Justice training would benefit the agency, what problems the agency
had encountered in implementing mapping, and which external sources
had funded crime mapping at the agency. Departments that reported no
use of computerized crime mapping were asked why that was the case,
whether they used electronic crime data, what types of software they
used, and what types of Department of Justice training would benefit
their agencies.
Complete Metadata
| aiCategory | Not AI-ready |
|---|---|
| bureauCode |
[ "011:21" ] |
| dataQuality | false |
| identifier | 3901 |
| internalContactPoint |
{
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"fn": "Jennifer Scherer",
"hasEmail": "mailto:Jennifer.Scherer@usdoj.gov"
}
|
| issued | 2001-02-16T00:00:00 |
| jcamSystem |
{
"acronym": "OJP_EXT",
"id": 8,
"name": "External system not available in CSAM"
}
|
| language |
[ "eng" ] |
| metadataModified | 9/2/2022 6:22:00 PM |
| programCode |
[ "011:060" ] |
| rights | These data are restricted due to the increased risk of violation of confidentiality of respondent and subject data. |
| sourceIdentifier | https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02878 |