Return to search results
💡 Advanced Search Tip
Search by organization or tag to find related datasets
SIR2016-5029_cfwgoshor_8b: Flood Inundation Depth for a Flow of 62,300 cfs at the Gage Coast Fork Willamette River at Goshen, Oregon (Area of Uncertainty)
The domain of the model is as follows: Row River from Dorena dam to the confluence with the Coast Fork;
Coast Fork from Cottage Grove dam to the confluence with the Middle Fork; Silk Creek from River Mile 1.7
to the confluence with the Coast Fork. The basis for these features is the Willamette Flood Insurance
Study – Phase One (2013). The hydraulics and hydrology for the FIS were reused in the production of
these polygons; the reports and information associated with the FIS are applicable to this product. The
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) utilized for the Willamette FIS submittal was produced by combining
multiple overlapping topographic surveys for the Middle Fork and Coast Fork of the Willamette River.
This DEM was created from four sources: LiDAR of the Springfield area that was flown in 2008, LiDAR
of Silk Creek that was flown in 2011, LiDAR of Fall Creek that was flown in 2012, and photogrammetry
of the Middle Fork and Coast Fork of the Willamette River that was flown in 2004. In areas where no
high-resolution elevation data were available, USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) data were used
to supplement the DEM. The shapefiles Hi_Res_Extents.shp and Low_Res_Extents.shp define the
limits of these areas. The horizontal datum of the DEM is NAD 1983 State Plane-Oregon South HARN
with units of International Feet (NAD83). The vertical datum of the elevation model is NAVD 1988 with
units of international feet (NAVD-88). In addition, some areas show surveyed bathymetry within the
channel. These can be noted by the sharp increase in apparent depth, creating a stripe across the
depth grid when compared to the LiDAR data, which represents the water surface elevation at the
time of the aerial data collection. Bridge decks are generally removed from DEMs as standard practice.
Therefore, these features may be shown as inundated when they are not. An effort to clip flood extents
on bridge decks was made, but judgement should be used when estimating the usefulness of a bridge
during flood flow. Comparing the bridge to the surrounding ground can be more informative in this respect
than simply looking at the bridge itself. The features and depth grids stop as the Coast Fork approaches
the Middle Fork on the northern end of the reach. See cfwgoshOR_breach.shp for information regarding
this file. This represents the depth grid for the 62,300 cfs profile.
Complete Metadata
| @id | http://datainventory.doi.gov/id/dataset/e47b4022e8621d491b74ea96438abb9c |
|---|---|
| bureauCode |
[ "010:12" ] |
| identifier | USGS:14c49403-19b2-410e-926d-3cc00538bbcf |
| spatial | -123.048840045,43.909466547,-122.949900456,44.011530659 |
| theme |
[ "geospatial" ] |