Return to search results
💡 Advanced Search Tip
Search by organization or tag to find related datasets
Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration: [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992
This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp)
programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot
camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were
sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock
incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1)
changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during
incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during
and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community
supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables
measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes
toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic
variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and
military experience. The community supervision data contain
information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such
as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and
employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and
contacts with community supervision officers, along with
demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key
areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a
psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community
supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For
most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey
were different from those who were surveyed in the community
supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and
sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are
organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state
level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender.
Complete Metadata
| aiCategory | Not AI-ready |
|---|---|
| bureauCode |
[ "011:21" ] |
| dataQuality | false |
| identifier | 3373 |
| internalContactPoint |
{
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"fn": "Jennifer Scherer",
"hasEmail": "mailto:Jennifer.Scherer@usdoj.gov"
}
|
| issued | 1998-07-28T00:00:00 |
| jcamSystem |
{
"acronym": "OJP_EXT",
"id": 8,
"name": "External system not available in CSAM"
}
|
| language |
[ "eng" ] |
| metadataModified | 9/2/2022 6:22:00 PM |
| programCode |
[ "011:060" ] |
| sourceIdentifier | https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986 |