Return to search results
💡 Advanced Search Tip
Search by organization or tag to find related datasets
Evaluation of Utah's Early Intervention Mandate: Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines and Intermediate Sanctions, 1996-2000
This study was an evaluation of changes initiated by the
State of Utah to reduce youth crime: a program of early intervention
comprised of Juvenile Sentencing Guidelines and a new intermediate
sanction called State Supervision. Together, the Sentencing Guidelines
and State Supervision sanction were designed to bring about a
reduction in juvenile recidivism rates and subsequently reduce the
number of offenders placed out of the home in the custody of the
Division of Youth Corrections by 5 percent. Researchers combined
quantitative measures of sentencing guidelines compliance and
recidivism rates with qualitative interviews of juvenile justice
system personnel and youth offenders. Data were gathered on all
offenders receiving a sentence to probation for the first time from
January to June during 1996 and 1999, enabling a comparison of
offenders before and after program implementation (Part 1, Juvenile
Information System Data). Part 1 data include demographic data, prior
charges, age at start of probation, detention use, reoffense, and
commitment to Youth Corrections. Interviews with 168 court and
corrections personnel were conducted in two interview rounds, from
June to December 1999, and again from July to September 2000,
soliciting their views of the sentencing guidelines, state
supervision, and probation (Parts 2-3, Juvenile Justice System
Personnel Interviews, Rounds 1 and 2). Interviews with 229 youth
offenders obtained information on their involvement with and views of
the sentencing guidelines, state supervision, and probation during a
single interview in either the first or second round (Parts 4-5, Youth
Offender Interviews, Rounds 1 and 2). A random sample of paper case
files for pre- and post-guideline offenders was selected to analyze
changes in contact and interventions provided (Part 6, Youth Offender
Case File Analysis). These files were examined for documentation of
contact frequency and type with offenders and their families and the
number and types of programs used.
Complete Metadata
| aiCategory | Not AI-ready |
|---|---|
| bureauCode |
[ "011:21" ] |
| dataQuality | false |
| identifier | 3830 |
| internalContactPoint |
{
"@type": "vcard:Contact",
"fn": "Jennifer Scherer",
"hasEmail": "mailto:Jennifer.Scherer@usdoj.gov"
}
|
| issued | 2003-07-03T00:00:00 |
| jcamSystem |
{
"acronym": "OJP_EXT",
"id": 8,
"name": "External system not available in CSAM"
}
|
| language |
[ "eng" ] |
| metadataModified | 9/2/2022 6:22:00 PM |
| programCode |
[ "011:060" ] |
| rights | These data are restricted due to the increased risk of violation of confidentiality of respondent and subject data. |
| sourceIdentifier | https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03502 |