Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Return to search results
πŸ’‘ Advanced Search Tip

Search by organization or tag to find related datasets

BLM Natl MLRS Mineral Materials

Published by Bureau of Land Management | Department of the Interior | Metadata Last Checked: September 19, 2025 | Last Modified: 2025-09-18T14:53:59.928Z
<div style='text-align:left;'><div><div><p style='font-size:12pt;'><span>This dataset contains mineral materials cases derived from Legal Land Descriptions (LLD) contained in the US Bureau of Land Management's, BLM, Mineral and Land Record System(MLRS) and geocoded (mapped) using the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) derived from the most accurate survey data available through BLM Cadastral Survey workforce. Geospatial representations might be missing for some cases that can not be geocoded using the MLRS algorithm. Mineral materials include common varieties of sand, stone,gravel, pumice, pumicite, clay, rock, and semi-precious and non-precious gemstone. This data set contains cases within the case type groupings for mineral materials of exploration permit, nonexclusive sale, exclusive sale, and free use with the case disposition of 'Authorized', 'Pending','Closed', or 'Interim'.</span></p><p><span style='font-size:16px;'>Each case is given a data quality score based on how well it mapped.Β  These can be lumped into seven groups to provide a simplified way to understand the scores.</span></p><p></p><ul><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 1: Direct PLSS Match. Scores β€œ0”, β€œ1”, β€œ2”, β€œ3” should all have a match to the PLSS data. There are slight differences, but the primary expectation is that these match the PLSS.Β </span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 2: Calculated PLSS Match. Scores β€œ4”, β€œ4.1”, β€œ5”, β€œ6”, β€œ7” and β€œ8” were generated through a process of creating the geometry that is not a direct capture from the PLSS. They represent a best guess based on the underlining PLSSΒ </span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 3 – Mapped to Section. Score of β€œ8.1”, β€œ8.2”, β€œ8.3”, β€œ9” and β€œ10” are mapped to the Section for various reasons (refer to log information in data quality field).Β </span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 4- Combination of mapped and unmapped areas. Score of 15 represents a case that has some portions that would map and others that do not.Β </span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 5 – No NLSDB Geometry, Only Attributes. Scores β€œ11”, β€œ12”, β€œ20”, β€œ21” and β€œ22” do not have a match to the PLSS and no geometry is in the NLSDB, and only attributes exist in the data.Β </span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 6 – Mapped to County. Scores of β€œ25” map to the County.</span></li><li><span style='font-size:16px;'>Group 7 – Improved Geometry. Scores of β€œ100” are cases that have had their geometry edited by BLM staff using ArcGIS Pro or MLRS bulk upload tool.</span></li></ul><p></p><p></p><p style='font-size:12pt;'></p></div></div></div>

Complete Metadata

data.gov

An official website of the GSA's Technology Transformation Services

Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov